Comments on: Significant trade mark / comparative advertising law victory for big brand owners http://www.strickland-law.co.uk/2009/06/30/significant-trade-mark-comparative-advertising-law-victory-for-big-brand-owners/ News and opinion from Strickland LLP, intellectual property and IT lawyer Thu, 15 Oct 2009 08:33:50 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 By: Ambush marketing - staying on the right side of the posts | Strickland trade mark lawyer http://www.strickland-law.co.uk/2009/06/30/significant-trade-mark-comparative-advertising-law-victory-for-big-brand-owners/comment-page-1/#comment-3 Ambush marketing - staying on the right side of the posts | Strickland trade mark lawyer Thu, 02 Jul 2009 10:15:38 +0000 http://www.stricklandtrademarklawyer.com/?p=372#comment-3 [...] Perhaps the RFU would have had a better case if it had registered ENGLISH RUGBY as a trade mark, particularly in view of the recent case of L’Oréal v Bellure as commented on in an earlier post. [...] [...] Perhaps the RFU would have had a better case if it had registered ENGLISH RUGBY as a trade mark, particularly in view of the recent case of L’Oréal v Bellure as commented on in an earlier post. [...]

]]>